I understand Prince Harry is taking on the daily mail in court, but why is Alan Carr the judge?

x.com/i/broadcasts/1ynJOMarj…

No, that still isn't true, and repeating it doesn't make it so. Using tariffs as leverage against allies is a threat, regardless of how it's dressed up. Calling it "treaty enforcement" doesn't change the mechanism. When a US president warns allied governments that they will face economic punishment unless they comply, that is pressure applied inside an alliance. It is not the same thing as a routine trade dispute between blocs, and pretending otherwise is simply evasion. On Greenland, this wasn't confined to defence spending at all. Trump openly pursued acquiring territory belonging to a NATO ally, refused to rule out force, and framed refusal as something the United States would "remember". The US already had basing rights, access, and strategic reach there. Ownership was unnecessary for defence. Once sovereignty is raised, allies interpret it as a threat whether the speaker intends it that way or not. That is how diplomacy works. You keep accusing me of accepting EU bullying when I've said the opposite, repeatedly. I oppose EU federalism. I oppose a European army. I oppose any attempt to dilute NATO. None of that has changed. You're arguing against a position I don't hold because it's easier than engaging with the one I do. What you continue to avoid is the core issue. Afghanistan and Iraq are not bargaining chips in today's disputes. They are wars in which men from multiple allied countries fought and died together. Generalising that Europeans "stayed back" is factually wrong. Correcting that isn't anti-American. It's accuracy. What's also striking is this: I've heard you defend Trump repeatedly, but I've yet to hear you offer the same defence to British forces who were killed or maimed fighting alongside the US. That silence speaks volumes. At this point, the problem isn't a lack of evidence. It's a refusal to accept it. Redefining threats until they conveniently disappear and dismissing disagreement as "EU abuse" doesn't strengthen your case. It just shows you're unwilling to deal with the record. And no, I'm not on the back foot here. I'm standing on facts and at this point it's clear you're out of your depth, resorting to bluster and accusation because the record doesn't support what you're saying.

Happy Friday.

That's a fair point, but it cuts both ways. Yes, European countries that still buy Russian oil or gas are indirectly funding Russia's war. That contradiction deserves criticism, and I've no problem saying those revenues should be factored into defence obligations. You can't bankroll Moscow with one hand and lean on Washington with the other. But let's be honest all the way through. Despite sanctions, the United States has also continued importing Russian enriched uranium under waivers because its nuclear sector still relies on it. So this isn't a uniquely European moral failure. It's a shared dependency problem that hasn't been fully solved on either side of the Atlantic. And none of this justifies rewriting history or diminishing allied sacrifice. Arguments about energy dependence and defence spending are valid. Using them to erase who fought and died alongside the US in Afghanistan or Iraq is not. Those are separate issues. Push allies to spend more. Absolutely. End energy hypocrisy. Agreed. But don't pretend the burden – or the compromises – have been carried by only one country.

I wrote a series of articles that would be named “Chicken Soup for reformed Communist soul” . 1st article tells you the horrifying story of arriving to USA on Halloween in 1991. Second article describes my first interview and job. Third one is about Thanksgiving. They are under Articles on my page. I want to know if I should combine all my stories in the book.

So let me get this straight. You're claiming that the EU and Canada threatened to annex the United States?

Is he servicing the growler now???

🚨BREAKING: Keir Starmer’s disgraceful Chagos Surrender has been pulled. Another HUGE u-turn from the worst prime minister in British history. Starmer must resign.

My home town is being destroyed by left wing cunts

🚨 Breaking: Keir Starmer PULLS Chagos surrender deal after Donald Trump attack gbnews.com/politics/politics…

This is the moment that a migrant, simply asked about his car insurance, attacked a police officer in Gateshead with a machete. He fled the scene in his car, ramming the police vehicle and leaving PC Hunter injured in the road, before being arrested in the nearby Saltwell area.... bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yx…

🤬🇬🇧

Let's help @MallardWar77423 reach 2K followers today! ❤️

⚜️⚜️Happy Friday Friends⚜️⚜️

Ephesians 6:10–18 10 Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. 11 Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. 12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. 13 Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. 14 Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, 15 and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. 16 In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. 17 Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. 18 And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people.

Lmaooo!

Piece by piece America is being replaced by Islamic colonialism

@ScottJenningsKY HOLLYWOOD PEDOPHILES STRIKES OUT AGAIN!! 🤮🤮🤮🤮🔥🔥🔥👺👺😈😈😈MAGA IS ON A ROLL 💪👱‍♀️❤️🤍💙❤️🤍💙❤️🤍💙❤️🤍💙

BANGLATOWN 😭😭😭 You just couldn’t write this shit 😂💀

I will remain hopeful for now.

I suppose then, it all depends on if the Reform muslims are genuine or plants and what his davos visit turns out like. Is it a " attend to get connections" while remaining aloof......or " one of the gang now" Again, time will tell!

Good morning Lilly 🥰

How was he a threat? Popularity with voters?

He became a threat to Farage.

Good Morning #Bluehandfamily and all #Patriots…. I hope you have a fantastic day… A Gentle Reminder #BeKind #Bluehand

I agree James.

Still don't understand what happened there.

I supposexpect time will tell........I see no political alternative atm though.

There is a rot setting in at the heart of our public life. It is not subtle. It is not polite. It is not accidental. It is a deliberate capture of the institutions that should define truth and protect our children. Reading Nicole Lampert in the Telegraph about Jewish teachers being forced out of the National Education Union is not a fringe story. It is a warning shot. A blaring alarm that the mental terrain of British education has been seized by those who mistake zealotry for justice. A union is meant to be a bulwark for its members, a shield for their rights, a platform for fair debate. What we see in the NEU under Daniel Kebede is something else entirely. A political club that bullies its way into classrooms and staff rooms, crowds out dissent, and creates a hostile environment for Jews who dare to speak about their own lives. A union representative telling a Jewish colleague that Israel "doesn't exist" is not ignorance. It is ideological coercion dressed up as discussion. Reality is not negotiable. Truth is not a matter of faction. When teachers march with flags, when they parade slogans like "intifada", when Al Jazeera is offered as if it were a neutral classroom resource, we have left the territory of education. We have entered political warfare in the very spaces where children should be taught how to think, not what to think. There is no "both sides" here when one side's creed demands the erasure of another people's history. Neutrality dies at the school gate under those conditions. The damage does not stop with silenced teachers. It lands on children who are too young to separate fact from fervour, authority from activism. When pupils are taught that a country can be wished out of existence, that slogans born in blood are "liberation", that one people's history is illegitimate, they are not being educated. They are being trained. Trained to see the world through grievance, to divide humanity into approved and forbidden identities, and to mistake moral certainty for moral courage. This is how prejudice is handed down wearing the costume of compassion. And let us not mince this. Blocking a Jewish MP, Damien Egan, from visiting a school because his presence "might inflame" certain groups is not safeguarding. It is capitulation. It is fear masquerading as care. It is telling the loudest bullies in the room that they have the power to dictate who may speak and who must keep silent. This is about capture. The union does not merely talk about Palestine. It has inserted itself between parents and children, between facts and feelings, between education and ideology. It shapes the narrative, pushes the politics, and appoints itself the arbiter of who is safe and who is suspect. Jewish teachers leave. Parents shrink back. Children are handed a narrowed lens through which the world must be viewed. The supposed protectors become gatekeepers of a single, rigid point of view. A free society does not thrive on one script. It thrives on contested ideas, on the clash of thought, on the right of each child to see the world in full, not through a sieve that filters out everything inconvenient. Education should widen minds, not bind them in the shackles of the latest political fashion. If we allow teachers' unions to become extensions of political movements, if we accept intimidation as "debate", if we tolerate the silencing of Jews inside their own union, then we have already surrendered a piece of what makes this country worth saving. This is not about one conflict. It is about the right of every voice to be heard in the classroom, and the duty of every educator to uphold fact over dogma. We should not flinch from saying it plainly. What has happened in the NEU is a betrayal of education, a threat to pluralism, and a sign that the ideology of the moment has snapped at the heels of reason. Face it now, or accept that we are raising a generation taught to chant before it can reason. Damien Egan and Daniel Kebede